mirror of
https://github.com/karatektus/pl_mail.git
synced 2026-10-25 10:04:18 +00:00
Paul LütznerandClaude Opus 5
376cf4ae72
Connect it with an address and an API token and it appears beside the other services; nothing else in the UI had to change, because the picker, the destination chooser and the connect dialog are all driven by the provider taxonomy and the driver interfaces. TAGS ARE THE CONTAINER LAYER. A document archive has no directory tree — Paperless replaced folders with tags and expects the rest to be found by searching — so the picker's "descend into a container, pick a file" has nothing to descend into. The root lists every tag as a folder with the newest documents beneath it, and opening a tag lists that tag's documents. Correspondents and document types would serve equally well and are deliberately not offered: three sideways slices of one archive is a navigation problem, and search already crosses all three. Search is Paperless's own full-text index, so it reads the OCR layer as well as the metadata and a scanned invoice is findable by a line item nobody typed. That is the feature: there is no longer a reason to open Paperless, find a document and download it before writing the mail. Upload is asynchronous — post_document answers with a task id, not a document id — so upload() returns it prefixed. Ids are opaque outside the driver, which is what makes the prefix safe, and download() refuses a task id with a sentence a person can act on rather than letting it 404 later. ShareLink is not declared. Minting a Paperless share link is a permissioned feature with its own expiry semantics, not something to do silently. The taxonomy test that assumed only photo services lack share links had a false premise; it now states the real rule rather than being relaxed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>